I was working with a teacher a year ago who was in the midst of just such a year. On top of having a difficult group, the children's parents were very vocal and wary also. They had heard that Mrs. B. was teaching "differently." Parents weren't at all sure that they liked the fact that she didn't have children sitting at desks in rows doing worksheets all day. They wondered if the children could be really learning. Wasn't all that activity and noise really an indication that Mrs. B. wasn't a very good teacher? And what was this stuff the teacher called developmentally appropriate practices anyway?!! Wasn't this another example of the stuff that critics in the popular press and media referred to as "feel good education and the self-esteem movement?"
Needless to say, that year was one that Mrs. B. was happy to say good-bye to in June. She was determined that she wasn't going to live through another year like it. She accepted that every once in awhile she was going to have a very challenging group of children, but she wanted ideas for being proactive with her families so that she could share her philosophy and strategies in ways that families could understand and support.
Teachers increasingly describe children as challenging, so too are families and communities. Gone are the days when the teachers' role is to shut her door and teach to a group of compliant children. The trust that the public had in its officials and public servants has evaporated in many places. Public education has come under public scrutiny in ways that are to teachers often bewildering and frightening.
While the research is telling us that we need to change how we work with children, many demanding public voices are telling us, "If it was good enough for us, it's good enough for our children." Many parents want to see their children learn the way they did. They want their children to have a better education than they had, which to many of them means not only what they had, but more of it! Families are rightfully uncomfortable and distrustful of strategies that they don't understand.
Where does this distrust come from? The publication of "A Nation At Risk" in 1984, sent alarm signals nationwide. Since then there have been innumerable reports in the newspapers and on television about the deterioration of public education. Answers to these concerns typically are published in professional education journals and never reach the light of day where the public has access to them. (If you would like more information about what educators are saying to answer the critics go to "What's Right With American Public Education.")The teaching profession has been a very insular one historically. We are accustomed to talking with each other, but not with our publics. We are not accustomed to being proactive; we have never had to be.
And so, the pendulum has swung back and forth and we have ridden the swing, pushed and pulled in multiple directions. We have become a rather cynical group. It is not uncommon to hear in a gathering of teachers, "This too will pass," as some new strategy or philosophy is shared.
These forces in education have propelled all of us into a period of disequilibrium. Just as disequilibrium is a marker for growth and change for children, it signals an opportunity for growth and change for educators as well. These negative currents are forcing us to redefine our role, to broaden it beyond the confines of the classroom. If we are to restructure education for children, we must become teachers of families as well. We must be able to share what we are doing in the classroom and describe how our strategies and materials contribute to the acquisition of skills for children. If we don't do this sharing, we must expect continuing distrust and roadblocks to change. We cannot go far without the partnership of parents!
What can teachers and administrators do to have an impact on the direction that education takes in the future?
Are you getting dizzy from riding the pendulum? Would you like to get off and become a force in winding the clock instead? There are some things that other school districts and teachers have been successful in doing that have impacted on public perceptions and support. They have involved families early when we are planning change. They have become better at describing to families and communities what they do in the classroom.
The remainder of this article will share some successful strategies and resources for this essential partnership with the public.
District/Building-Level Strategies
Regie Routman, in her book Literacy At the Crossroads (1996), shares the stories of several school districts; their challenges and successes as they worked to involve their publics in real, meaningful ways.
The former superintendent, Ms. Chavez, shares her number one recommendation, "Seek first to understand.' Carve out meaningful dialogue, and what that means is not telling first, but rather, asking a lot of thoughtful questions and listening. Probe, probe, probe. But do it gently, as a caring spouse or friend would. Figure out what the parent concerns are. Ask effective questions that build trust. Arm yourself with facts. Have information that can help influence peoples' judgment. Listen with an open mind. Don't give the answers to your questions, even if you know them. If we do this for parents--offer options and get their feedback--with the majority of parents, we'll have greater support." For more information on parent involvement go to Parent Involvement: Literature Review and Database of Promising Practices
Teacher/Classroom Strategies
The above strategies are ones that require a building or district focus. They are very important, but no more important than what teachers do in their classrooms to help parents understand how children are learning. What can we do in our classrooms to share this information with families?
Bring parents in as helpers rather than observers, though observation is a legitimate role too. Many districts hold orientation sessions for parent volunteers. It is very important that they understand what their role is while they're in the classroom and that confidentiality is observed.
(You might like to know that Mrs. B. used several of these strategies and the next year had a very supportive relationship with her families.)
These are just a few suggestions for building a true community of learners where all stakeholders are respected and have a role.
I think Regie Routman said it very well when she wrote in Literacy At the Crossroads, "If we want to influence the course of public education, and we must, then we as educators must clarify issues for a wider public audience--the media, parents, school boards, local and federal government. Democracy gives us the freedom and opportunity to speak out and be heard. We must seize that right. Otherwise, much of what we know and believe about teaching and learning may be lost, simply because we didn't make the effort to raise our voices."
Diffily, Deborah and Morrison, Kathy. Ed. Family-Friendly Communication for Early Childhood Programs. National Association for the Education of Young Children. 1996.
Dodge, Diane Trister, The Creative Curriculum For Early Childhood. Teaching Strategies. 1989.
Routman, Regie, Literacy At the Crossroads, Heineman. 1996.
You might also wish to visit the
Family-Friendly Teacher Talk
pages where teachers and administrators share words and strategies
for describing practice with families.
Back to Home Page